Back to Blog
Guides

Cost Optimization Strategies for AI Applications

Learn how to reduce your AI costs by up to 60% with smart model selection and caching strategies.

D

Developer Relations

DevRel

January 2, 2025
10 min read
optimization
cost
best-practices
caching
Share:

The Hidden Cost of AI

AI models are incredibly powerful, but they can also be incredibly expensive. A single GPT-4 request might cost $0.01 — that's nothing, right? But at 1 million requests per month, that's $10,000.

In this guide, we'll share battle-tested strategies to reduce your AI costs by up to 60% without sacrificing quality.

Strategy 1: Choose the Right Model

The most impactful optimization is using the right model for each task.

Model Cost Comparison

ModelInput/1MOutput/1MBest For

GPT-4o$2.50$10.00Complex reasoning
GPT-4o-mini$0.15$0.60General tasks
Claude 3.5 Sonnet$3.00$15.00Long documents
Claude 3.5 Haiku$0.25$1.25Fast responses
Gemini 2.0 Flash$0.075$0.30Multimodal, speed
DeepSeek-V3$0.27$1.10Best value

Decision Framework

Simple FAQ/Lookup → GPT-4o-mini or Gemini Flash

General Chat → GPT-4o-mini or Claude Haiku

Complex Analysis → GPT-4o or Claude Sonnet

Code Generation → Claude Sonnet or DeepSeek

Summarization → Gemini Flash or DeepSeek

Potential Savings: 30-50%

Strategy 2: Prompt Optimization

Shorter prompts = fewer tokens = lower costs.

Before (wasteful)

System: You are a helpful assistant. Your job is to help users with their

questions. Please be friendly and professional. Make sure to provide accurate

information. If you don't know something, please say so. Always be respectful

and considerate in your responses. Try to be concise but thorough.

User: What's the weather like?

Token count: ~80 tokens

After (optimized)

System: Helpful assistant. Be concise and accurate.

User: What's the weather like?

Token count: ~15 tokens

Savings: 81% on system prompt!

Tips for Prompt Optimization

  • Remove filler words ("please", "make sure to", "try to")
  • Use bullet points instead of paragraphs
  • Move examples to few-shot format only when needed
  • Use shorter variable names in structured outputs
  • Potential Savings: 20-40%

    Strategy 3: Response Caching

    Many requests are identical or similar. Cache them!

    Simple Cache Implementation

    import crypto from 'crypto';
    
    

    const cache = new Map<string, { response: string; timestamp: number }>();

    const CACHE_TTL = 3600000; // 1 hour

    function getCacheKey(model: string, messages: Message[]): string {

    const content = JSON.stringify({ model, messages });

    return crypto.createHash('md5').update(content).digest('hex');

    }

    async function cachedCompletion(

    model: string,

    messages: Message[]

    ): Promise<string> {

    const key = getCacheKey(model, messages);

    const cached = cache.get(key);

    if (cached && Date.now() - cached.timestamp < CACHE_TTL) {

    return cached.response; // Free!

    }

    const response = await client.chat.completions.create({

    model,

    messages,

    });

    const content = response.choices[0].message.content || '';

    cache.set(key, { response: content, timestamp: Date.now() });

    return content;

    }

    When to Cache

    • FAQ responses
    • Static content generation
    • Translation of common phrases
    • Code boilerplate generation

    When NOT to Cache

    • Personalized responses
    • Time-sensitive information
    • Creative content (where variety matters)

    Potential Savings: 20-60% (depends on hit rate)

    Strategy 4: Batching Requests

    Instead of making many small requests, batch them:

    Before (10 requests)

    const results = [];
    

    for (const item of items) {

    const result = await complete(Summarize: ${item});

    results.push(result);

    }

    // 10 API calls, 10x overhead

    After (1 request)

    const prompt = items
    

    .map((item, i) => [${i}] ${item})

    .join('\n\n');

    const result = await complete(

    Summarize each item:

    ${prompt}

    Return as JSON: [{"id": 0, "summary": "..."}, ...]

    );

    // 1 API call

    Potential Savings: 30-50% (reduced overhead)

    Strategy 5: Truncation & Summarization

    Long contexts are expensive. Truncate or summarize when possible.

    Smart Context Management

    function manageContext(messages: Message[], maxTokens: number): Message[] {
    

    let totalTokens = 0;

    const result: Message[] = [];

    // Always keep system message

    const system = messages.find(m => m.role === 'system');

    if (system) {

    result.push(system);

    totalTokens += estimateTokens(system.content);

    }

    // Add messages from newest to oldest

    for (let i = messages.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {

    const msg = messages[i];

    if (msg.role === 'system') continue;

    const tokens = estimateTokens(msg.content);

    if (totalTokens + tokens > maxTokens) break;

    result.unshift(msg);

    totalTokens += tokens;

    }

    return result;

    }

    Summarization for Long Conversations

    async function summarizeHistory(messages: Message[]): Promise<string> {
    

    const history = messages

    .filter(m => m.role !== 'system')

    .map(m => ${m.role}: ${m.content})

    .join('\n');

    const summary = await complete(

    Summarize this conversation in 2-3 sentences:

    ${history}

    , 'gpt-4o-mini'); // Use cheap model for summarization

    return summary;

    }

    Potential Savings: 40-70% (on long conversations)

    Strategy 6: Set Token Limits

    Always set max_tokens to prevent runaway costs:

    const response = await client.chat.completions.create({
    

    model: 'gpt-4o',

    messages: [...],

    max_tokens: 500, // Prevent 10,000 token responses

    });

    Recommended Limits by Use Case

    Use Casemax_tokens

    Yes/No questions10
    Short answers100
    Explanations300
    Code generation1000
    Long-form content2000

    Potential Savings: 10-30%

    Strategy 7: Monitor and Alert

    You can't optimize what you don't measure.

    Set Up in COZHUB Dashboard

  • Daily cost alerts: Get notified if spend exceeds threshold
  • Per-model breakdown: Identify expensive models
  • Request volume tracking: Spot unusual spikes
  • Key Metrics to Track

    • Cost per request (by model)
    • Cache hit rate
    • Token efficiency (output/input ratio)
    • Error rate (failed requests = wasted money)

    Real-World Example

    Let's see these strategies in action:

    Before Optimization:

    • 100,000 requests/month
    • All using GPT-4o
    • Average 1,000 tokens per request
    • Monthly cost: $7,500

    After Optimization:

    • 50% → GPT-4o-mini (simple queries)
    • 30% → GPT-4o (complex queries)
    • 20% → Cached responses
    • 30% prompt token reduction
    • Monthly cost: $2,100

    Total Savings: 72%!

    Summary

    StrategyPotential SavingsEffort

    Model selection30-50%Low
    Prompt optimization20-40%Medium
    Caching20-60%Medium
    Batching30-50%Medium
    Context management40-70%High
    Token limits10-30%Low

    Next Steps

  • Audit your current usage in COZHUB dashboard
  • Identify your top 5 most expensive request types
  • Apply model selection optimization first (biggest impact, lowest effort)
  • Implement caching for repeated queries
  • Set up monitoring and alerts
  • Need help optimizing? Contact our team for a free cost analysis.

    Happy saving! 💰

    Ready to get started?

    Create a free account and get $5 in credits